Obviously for an $85 per person brunch Buffett you know it will be special. In this case the food selections certainly are. All you can eat oysters, lobster tails, filet mignon, prime rib, lamb chops, and much more.
I also tried two omelets which rate high as the best omelets I've ever eaten and I don't even like an omelette. The three big issues for me are value (not for what you get but for what you really need), service (not as sharp as I'd have thought and our waiter seemed less than engaged surprisingly) and ambiance (that old Vegas style restaurant with no natural light of any kind and honestly it's still just a buffet).
My personal opinion is that once you surpass a certain price point buffets really are silly. Our meals with tax costs us $97 per person!! Plus tip. All that spent and I still have to serve myself from the buffet. How does this make sense? Unless you are so greedy that you will honestly eat a couple lobster tails, five filet mignonette, etc how is there value here?
I went to Morels and had a memorable meal with amazing service and alcohol and I spent the same as we did on a buffet where you serve yourself. Maybe I'm a snob but for $200 plus tip I'd rather have one amazing plate instead of piling my plate high with filet mignon. If you can afford $97 for brunch per person I'm assuming you've eaten pretty well and a lobster tail is not going to impress you (I can get that at Red Lobster).
I hated the ambiance. I like old Vegas and respect it as a local, raised in Vegas. But no light and just a depressing decor is not what I want for a relaxing brunch.
You can spend your $200 a lot better ways in Vegas for two.