. . "3"^^ . "2"^^ . "0"^^ . "2014-05-05T00:00:00"^^ . "5"^^ . "For the life of me, I don't know why people throw around 4 and 5 stars for the food here.\n\nThe food lacked flavor. Should be \"0\" stars. There is no category of \"sad\" to select, either: my traveling companions, unfortunately, agreed with me. Whoever writes their menu should write ads for online daters, as my friend Dita likes to say (and she is quoted so often): Singles in Sin City would be getting more ass than a toilet seat if we put these folks on the job.\n\nThe drinks were watered down. We all noticed, except for the one person who ordered a bottled beer (he's my attorney, a senior partner from the law firm I call 'Sharks & Piranhas.') You're liable to get higher from your blood being too thinned-out by consuming their drinks (and being on the high desert plateau) than you'll ever be from the alcohol in their beverages. Maybe 1 star, at best.\n\nThe service was good, but I declined the offer to provide me with another entree. Not a fan of getting someone's phlegm in my food.\n\nStill, I guess that getting real -- but bland, tasteless -- food is far better than the so-called best offered by McDonald's."^^ . .