"We were purchasing a home with a pool and never owning a pool before we hired Quality Pool Service for $95.00 to come out and inspect the pool as part of our home inspection.\n\n\n\nHere is Quality Pool Service's report ...\n\nDate: April 27, 2017\n\nTo Whom it May Concern,\n\nAfter final inspection of the pool on Tuesday April 25th, we have put together our findings for the location notes (sic) above.\n\nThere are no current leaks at the equipment area. There is evidence of previous leaks on both the filter and the motor. No attention needed for this. All the equipment is properly bonded. There is an operational Hayward T-9 salt cell on this pool that is producing chlorine. The Hayward Navigator pool cleaner is operational. There is no pool light installed in this pool. The pool has an interior pebble finish. The finish is in good condition. The decking overall is in good condition. The acrylic painted surface is flacking (sic) off on the cantilever edge that rolls into the pool. This is cosmetic and can be repainted. There are a few surface cracks. This is not causing damage to the deck. There is a small spot above the skimmer where the decking has fallen off. This can be fixed at the same time the other decking items are addressed. This is not causing any operational issues.\n\nWe also offer full service pool cleaning...\n\nRustin Genet - President, Quality Pool Service, Inc.\n\n\n\nOne month later on May 26th, Rustin came to our house for the first cleaning and to show us how to use the equipment. At that time he told us:\n1) The pool has black algae and in order to get rid of it the pool needs to be drained, the algae treated, and the pool refilled.\n2) The salt levels in the pool are twice what they should be and are so high that the equipment that monitors the salt level is not able to measure it.\nAlso, we have noticed that when we manually turn the pump on and off that it leaks so badly that it soaks our pants.\nWhen we reminded him that he had just done an inspection on our pool and none of these items were in the inspection Rustin's reply was, \"I did?\"\n\nI called the office to try and see if anything could be done and they were very defensive and not helpful. \n\nNow, being a month later we have no financial recourse with the old owner, we must pay out of pocket to have these issues taken care of, and we have paid $95.00 for a useless inspection."^^ . "1"^^ . "3"^^ . "0"^^ . . . "2017-06-01T00:00:00"^^ . "0"^^ . .