<http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/O4eqQBFBKN_SM0tovQnBXQ>	<http://schema.org/itemReviewed>	<http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/mJqc71ZLSZcCBX3GN_ABEA> .
<http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/O4eqQBFBKN_SM0tovQnBXQ>	<http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#usefulReviews>	"10"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int> .
<http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/O4eqQBFBKN_SM0tovQnBXQ>	<http://purl.org/stuff/rev#rating>	"1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int> .
<http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/O4eqQBFBKN_SM0tovQnBXQ>	<http://purl.org/stuff/rev#text>	"Everything in my first review still applies, except that \"I don't think the paper is a bad product\" part. What was I thinking? It seems like it's becoming a thinner paper, relying more on wire stories, and they're probably still losing money. I can't imagine a scenario where I'd ever pay for this paper again.\n\nOh, and the AZ Central comment leavers are still a bunch of turds."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string> .
<http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/O4eqQBFBKN_SM0tovQnBXQ>	<http://purl.org/stuff/rev#reviewer>	<http://data.yelp.com/User/id/hoCTR-aiEcRJT8asMVKu0w> .
<http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/O4eqQBFBKN_SM0tovQnBXQ>	<http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#funnyReviews>	"1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int> .
<http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/O4eqQBFBKN_SM0tovQnBXQ>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://purl.org/stuff/rev#Review> .
<http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/O4eqQBFBKN_SM0tovQnBXQ>	<http://schema.org/dateCreated>	"2009-01-28T00:00:00"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime> .
<http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/O4eqQBFBKN_SM0tovQnBXQ>	<http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#coolReviews>	"0"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int> .