"3"^^ . "1"^^ . "0"^^ . "1"^^ . "Tilapia is NOT Snapper. Cashier made a mistake while reading my sashimi selection back to me ... said \"tilapia\" instead of \"snapper\", which is what I ordered. Tilapia is absolutely nowhere on the menu, but, for some reason, she said \"tilapia\". Why would she say that? When I asked her to repeat it again, she said \"snapper\" the second time.\n\nI'm very familiar with both types of fish and both, in sashimi form, look almost identical. The flavor was extremely close to tilapia and upon further investigation and discussion with my wife, we're 99% certain we were given tilapia. Look up images of snapper and tilapia sashimi and see what you think.\n\nI wouldn't have a problem with getting tilapia instead of snapper if they told me that I was getting a sub and adjusted the price for the cheaper grade of fish. There is a very, very slight chance that I really did get snapper, but the fact that she said \"tilapia\" leads me to believe that I didn't and that they use tilapia as a sub for snapper and customers aren't made aware of that.\n\nAnyway, the rolls that I've tried along with most of the sashimi are good. For fast food sushi, it's not too bad.\n\nI just have a problem with restaurants who assume diners won't know the subtle differences in specific ingredients. Another reviewer mentioned getting a cheaper ingredient subbed for a premium one in his soup. Therefore, it seems like this is a common practice at this spot."^^ . "2015-05-09T00:00:00"^^ . . . .