This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n6http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n5http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:w4mIhsiFGhYBdiCIb7uxvQ
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2014-05-05T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n5:JsCKeWHA8n_5mFQ3F6t4UA
n6:funnyReviews
5
rev:rating
2
n6:usefulReviews
3
rev:text
For the life of me, I don't know why people throw around 4 and 5 stars for the food here. The food lacked flavor. Should be "0" stars. There is no category of "sad" to select, either: my traveling companions, unfortunately, agreed with me. Whoever writes their menu should write ads for online daters, as my friend Dita likes to say (and she is quoted so often): Singles in Sin City would be getting more ass than a toilet seat if we put these folks on the job. The drinks were watered down. We all noticed, except for the one person who ordered a bottled beer (he's my attorney, a senior partner from the law firm I call 'Sharks & Piranhas.') You're liable to get higher from your blood being too thinned-out by consuming their drinks (and being on the high desert plateau) than you'll ever be from the alcohol in their beverages. Maybe 1 star, at best. The service was good, but I declined the offer to provide me with another entree. Not a fan of getting someone's phlegm in my food. Still, I guess that getting real -- but bland, tasteless -- food is far better than the so-called best offered by McDonald's.
n6:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n7:bl2JJL3Yxc5OVdHSJeoohA