This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n5http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n4http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:tDLohL37Z_YjyymF7zg0mA
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2012-08-02T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:gyO6cj2zy6Cj7lL7Mx53_A
n5:funnyReviews
2
rev:rating
1
n5:usefulReviews
17
rev:text
I found American Home Guardian through Local First Arizona and have tried supporting them as a realtor by buying several policies for home buyers recently. The first policy I ordered, they lost track of payment.... Fair enough, it was somewhat easily fixed and I know mistakes sometimes happen. But then it happened again just a couple months later! Each time this happens means more time that an escrow officer and I must both spend addressing their mistake, so I'm not thrilled with AHG's track record thus far. I never had this issue with one of AHG's competitors that I used in the past. Today, when I called at the request of the buyer's agent -- thinking I was just inquiring about this payment issue -- I was first put on hold for 20 minutes (my phone said 21:07 when I actually got someone on the line). This is the general phone number, which is where my client might call if they have a repair problem, so I'm once again a little annoyed that they would put anyone on hold that long. Then when someone answered, I learned that the delay was due to this same homeowner who inquired about the policy and was the cause of my call. I guess this means that they have only one person on the phone?! Seriously?! Thankfully, I just learned that this buyer was still able to cancel payment and get a different policy. However, I'm still concerned for my other clients. I cannot put my professional reputation on the line by recommending a company that treats its customers this way, nor am I willing to repeatedly throw $350-400 toward a company that makes me look bad. No bueno, AHG. Sad we couldn't make this work.
n5:coolReviews
1
rev:reviewer
n4:9SiMC8YFsAZi1kZ-cyxG6w