This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:t0FClgvQmaD71X1YBejORQ
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2009-02-26T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:jZeLcFDCfBhAxjq1Owe65A
n3:funnyReviews
1
rev:rating
1
n3:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
Just logged on to amtrak.com to buy a one way ticket to Chicago for a Monday train a couple weeks from now. Price for a ONE WAY ticket has gone up yet again to $37.00!!!!! Thanks to a slow day at work, I decided to do the math on this to see exactly how much of a ripoff Amtrak really is. At $1.70 a gallon for gas, even if you were to drive a Hummer H2 to Chicago, it would only cost $21.00 in gas to get there. If you've got a Prius, driving would run you less than $5.00. A 38 foot Winnebago would cost about $32.00. In fact, you would need a vehicle that gets only 6.2 MPG for Amtrak to be the less expensive option. Did I mention I'm having a slow day at work? Moral of the story: Don't waste your time looking at Amtrak as an alternative to driving. Even if you have a vehicle large enough comfortably sleep 6, it's still cheaper to drive. I also don't imagine Amtrak's reliability issues have been resolved by the price increases, so the extra cost really doesn't get you anything other than a strong likelihood of a 90+ minute delay in reaching your destination.
n3:coolReviews
1
rev:reviewer
n7:wHNHNzMghPsCSAkqR_OxPw