This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n5http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
n4http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:re30C4R-itxEKr_BA4AEjw
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2016-03-26T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n4:BALg7mtAI-tHltJ0WRRiPw
n5:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
5
n5:usefulReviews
2
rev:text
It is evident to me now that any negative reviews Gemma's has received are unwarranted. I recently stumbled upon Gemma's on Yelp and decided to give it a shot. Although I'm clearly not the target demographic - Gemma's very apparently primarily pursues the certainly more lucrative wedding market (compared to my infrequent men's pants alterations) - I was treated fairly, received expedient service, was impressed with the storefront, and was given an excellently crafted product. I'm a fairly normal size, so I don't frequently get my clothes altered. Approximately twice a year (give or take), I'll need different suit-pants taken in or out a little. Given my lack of experience, I often wonder aimlessly for alterations and invariably end up getting it done at one of our local cleaners. Inevitably, I'm left with adequate work and nearly no customer service for a relatively high price. Gemma's storefront is infinitely more appealing than any of these cleaners, I received quicker service, and I paid about half at Gemma's what I usually do at any of these cleaners. I've already recommended it to female friends who are likely to need wedding alterations in the near future!
n5:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n7:8CuQ62F7aHawvtQ9_mX4Xg