This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n6http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
n4http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:mfmusbdNRqdK7DrUPgSvAA
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2014-09-13T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n4:z8XIldYr65CKOz8yOI5R8A
n6:funnyReviews
2
rev:rating
2
n6:usefulReviews
6
rev:text
I used points and stayed in a (ridiculously) large suite with my wife, celebrating a milestone. I assign a rating of two stars to this JW compared to other "luxury resort" properties. The room was dated and tired. I shared this same feedback on the post-stay Marriott survey. The towels were wafer thin and threadbare. The toiletries were fairly cheap. The furnishings were depressing. However, the bed was comfy! The staff was very friendly. Ordinarily, I'm not very demanding of people. I think most folks care and try. I'm more demanding of Marriott as a company. In this case I will criticize the people a small bit, and will say that the room service people could use better training. My order was slightly wrong, and they forgot to bring a bottle opener. Also, the room service food was second/third rate. It's not a huge deal, but it's also not better than two stars. I am a Marriott Platinum Elite member. In the future, I'll save my points for a Ritz-Carlton because this JW reminded me more of a Courtyard property.
n6:coolReviews
1
rev:reviewer
n7:P7Q6ebWYafBuqTirksUpdA