This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n5http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n6http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:lAVrgNMiWTHwyRm3Lx6aBw
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2013-01-11T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:L98yev_7So-Tgx82IsjVeA
n5:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
3
n5:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
As far as my expectations for a fast food burger place go, this location isn't that bad. I needed a place to let the kids let out some energy so the playground was it. I was pretty happy with the cleanliness of the playground and there is a hand sanitizer dispenser right by the playground door. This, I appreciate. It's a burger king, so really if it isn't a filthy mess it's pretty difficult to call it a disappointment unless something is really wrong. They got my order right (ordering for myself and 4 kids so it wasn't a simple one). I am curious though when burger king's prices began to creep up. Their marketing and decor seems to be trying to send me a message that they're a casual restaurant now instead of fast food. I appreciate the effort to elevate their image, but the food doesn't reflect that yet so let's put the whopper somewhere further below 4 bucks again, please? (I remember when they were a buck.) But, yeah, I can imagine that most fast food places only get reviewed when a customer is upset. I don't think this location deserves such a bad rap.
n5:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n6:hVRpLwPfgRaU6sllAHpnAw