This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n7http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n5http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:kMzOgHz0wRwyeAjhxDpNDg
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2017-07-29T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:xvjkhS2PXajDniDzP1-hdA
n7:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
1
n7:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
I liked the front staff, so I want to point out that my experience with them was good. With that said, I'm not satisfied with the medical treatment from the veterinarian. My German Shepherd is a very submissive dog to everyone, and I've never had a complaint about him, so I was told that his ear could not be flushed last week or this week because he was resisting treatment. When I confronted the charges of the ear cleaning from last week, the story was changed that his ear was in fact cleaned the first time. I did not notice his ears to be wet last time and I even asked if his ears were actually cleaned. Moreover, I've always been given a bigger bottle of keto ear flush from every other vet when this occurs, but I was prescribed a bottle that was too small, so I ran out before the week was even over and had to buy another smaller bottle on the second visit. To put it simply, I believe that I've been charged for treatment that was not actually applied and their story is not consistent with charges on my receipt. I recommend another vet to be honest.
n7:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n5:oI3aeEUk3V3qpPJGv3_iDg