This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n6http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:iJw6qlNuEj4Ia5ieYqML-Q
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2015-10-01T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:4LUkhx8ZVoGDVoxhpSxVHg
n3:funnyReviews
1
rev:rating
2
n3:usefulReviews
2
rev:text
I'm rating a wedding that I attended here on a Saturday. Honestly, I'm not going to criticize every little detail about the wedding but, I think you're better off spending your money on a national park or somewhere cheaper but, still, classy. I've been to weddings at houses or even beaches. There's plenty of options than this place, unless you're on a time constraint, then, by all means, get married here. Pros: convenient (if you live close by), quaint, and all inclusive(decor, minister, and flowers). Pastor was funny/personable, probably the only thing I like. Cons: It felt cheap and tacky. I know the reviews are from the brides/grooms, but, save your money and the trip, you're wedding can be cheap and still be classy. We arrived in a cramped hall. Guest count maybe 60-80 people? Another wedding party was already waiting in line to go next. After the ceremony, barely, any time for photos because you're quickly kicked out for the next bride and groom. It did not feel like a wedding. All weddings should feel romantic, this did not. But, clearly, this is just coming from the point of view of a guest.
n3:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n6:r2jtufGYOlR9YGKQNsslkw