This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:iCKugerZy1oqnNB1PI2vKA
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2016-08-24T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:rRw1p1_KVmGmguKalgEa_Q
n3:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
4
n3:usefulReviews
4
rev:text
My initial consultation was very good. Franco was very professional and knew his stuff. He showed up on time, which is always a plus. When I asked what is the next step was I was told there was an initial deposit of $1000 to draw up the landscaping plan, and refundable if I went with them for the job. This is where they lost me, since most landscape companies do not charge for an initial design. My vision was quite unique, and I was not sure we were on the same page. I didn't want to spend the money just to find out. I am not giving them a horrible rating just because it is there business model to charge for a plan. I just think future clients should know what to expect. It would also be unfair to give them any higher rating since I do not have first hand experience with them completing a job for me. Initial consultation - 5 stars $ 1000 for a plan - 2.5 stars Quality of work - No first hand experience That being said, I believe I will hire a landscape architect, if I need to pay for a plan, then I have the plan in hand, which I know it fulfills my contemporary minimalist vision. That gives me the ability to bid that same apples to apples plan out to several landscaping contractors. I will probably save the architects fee plus some.
n3:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n7:JQiCj4Ol0J-JafAlJTUSvQ