This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n6http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
n4http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:hqZqOTH4uGT8QV48KVy5CQ
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2012-01-03T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n4:qiNwjqpBxx3GPdkU8zY3og
n6:funnyReviews
1
rev:rating
1
n6:usefulReviews
5
rev:text
I wouldn't consider going back to this store. They had advertised for a particular model of Sony Camcorder in their flyer, I called the store twice over 2 days to ask if they had stock. Both times it was confirmed that the product was in stock and would be held for me to pick up. I drove about an hour to get to the store, and they pulled out another camcorder of a similar model, but lower in grade and tried to pass it off as the same product. When I noticed that the model numbers were different, I was told that they had "made a mistake on the flyer", and what was listed on the flyer was not actually available, and that this was "all they had". They then told me they could offer me a "really good price" on the product, but was not worth it at all. Considering I had called twice to confirm the make and model of the product, if it was an honest mistake it would not have taken more than 2 minutes to actually read the model # on the box and realize it's not the same as what was advertised. I wonder how many people have bought the camcorder thinking it was a great deal but then realized they were ripped off. Honest mistake? I don't think so.
n6:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n7:DYcjrMg-IzCM1sXaAgC9dg