This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n6http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:h3omrFbglOkcLuM2Hfo9Zw
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2016-12-09T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:_HqZV2Y9VGPNFbSMNs84bQ
n3:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
2
n3:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
I'm really baffled by all the 5 star reviews. I tried the ribs, pulled pork and chicken wings, and a wide variety of the sides. The ribs were tender but had a mostly gummy texture with just a little bit of crunchy texture where the grilling at the end had added it. They do a sous vide treatment to the meat first, then smoking and a final grilling step. I think their process still needs work. I like a classic tender/chewy quality to my ribs. While sous vide might work in other applications, bbq ribs might not be one--maybe more time in the smoker might help. The pulled pork also felt off texture-wise to me and had some off flavors that didn't go with what I hope for from pulled pork. I should say that both pork meats came with the house bbq sauce which was kind of unusual. Not really identifiable as Carolina, Memphis, or St. Louis, etc ...it is its own thing but didn't really appeal to me at all. The chicken wings were kind of ok, a little dry, but the skin was crunchy. The flavor to me was not that great. I had no urge to chow through a whole pile of them. The sides were unmemorable. My two star rating feels a little generous to me. I guess since they are new I'd like to give them little bit of room to improve things but I doubt that I will ever be back.
n3:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n6:NB65G5wSruLuyfnz0D7gSA