This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n4http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:eFeBn6py_HTIM5vRSdhRpg
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2007-01-23T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:InDH4ZQ_byiQ5PyaqgHI8Q
n4:funnyReviews
3
rev:rating
1
n4:usefulReviews
5
rev:text
Who can resist going to a place called, "Big Mama's Rib Shack"? I couldn't! I love me some barbecue, especially ribs! Located near Rancho and the 95, I was excited to try this place! I ordered the full slab of ribs and the fried chicken dinner. With it, I ordered the greens, yams, hush puppies, and macaroni & cheese. Big Mama must've not been there, because she probably wouldn't have approved of the quality of the food put out that day. The greens, yams, and macaroni & cheese were decent, the hush puppies were too salty, and the fried chicken was pretty tasty. But the place is called "Big Mama's Rib Shack", not Big Mama's Chicken House. The ribs were such a disappointment! Not only were they teeth-ripping tough, they were obviously at least a day old and reheated (not very well). My ribs were, at most, a warm 85 degrees...I'm sure the health department wouldn't approve. The fried chicken was actually very good, but does that warrant an extra star? Hmmm...it's supposed to be a rib place, so I think not.
n4:coolReviews
2
rev:reviewer
n7:E7sk9jsImePqLT4roNgotg