This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n5http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:daylYp1wRMidS4tBgM1xxA
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2013-06-23T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:-2hOglg7Lh8ZgclQJ9ba2w
n3:funnyReviews
3
rev:rating
2
n3:usefulReviews
4
rev:text
URSA. I had been hearing that I need to try this place out. So I did. Aaaaand it was a definitely let down. Drinks: Shmancy ingredients, average taste. My Mojito with "foraged mint" was decent, nothing more. I tried the Whiskey Sour, also with fancy ingredients came up short. But still, the food menu looked so enticing with innovative ingredients like "nutriceutical berry and probiotic creme fraiche" I was still excited. Raw Bread: I pictured actual bread when I ordered it, but no, it's a few tiny thin tasteless crackers with a smidgeon of butter. Starter: Salad, boring. And for 20$ I was expecting a delicious dance in my mouth. Main: Duck. There were two different parts of duck on my plate, one part was tough, and chewy but had a nice flavour (at least) and the other part was tiny but moist and delicious. Dessert: This was the best dish. It was tiny, but decadent. Chocolate and caramel textures. Will I recommend URSA to friends? NO. Will i go back? NO. Do I feel I got my money's worth? NOPE. Overall: Tiny portions, average taste.
n3:coolReviews
2
rev:reviewer
n5:OXDIm9gqgtedByYC_D7Vig