This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n5http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:d9-uphXYX3lMAOMctShBQg
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2014-07-11T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:4jn57yyEa0p-mcxz2oRkTw
n5:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
1
n5:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
I ordered a kit as well as needles from Superior and will never make that mistake again. The prizm ink that they sell is pretty worthless. It fades fast and is a pain to work with. It will end up causing clients more pain because you have to work it much more than you would with a better ink. The machines that came in the kit are unreliable. I've had to take mine apart and readjust it as well as clean out the contact screw because they painted it. I bought a box of 6 flat needles May 2014. They expire September 2014. I've not been impressed with them at all. I do like however the boxes the machines came in. But other than that I feel pretty ripped off. The inks are just trash and I will never again use them for any supplies I may need. I'm new to tattooing and they obviously take advantage of someone new to the field. I ended up buying a new machine from a local shop and the difference is night and day. Save your skin and your clients skin, don't buy from superior. Good inks I have found are starbright and intenze. I wish I had known about how bad superior was before I ordered from them I would have gladly paid a bit more for better quality inks and machines that wouldn't have to get replaced ASAP.
n5:coolReviews
2
rev:reviewer
n7:MjZZx9ZWQhEitnZwjYE1Qw