This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n5http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:b_5bbLqVZgAvCGR9b8yuKA
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2017-06-24T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:La4X3ap5HvTNa0kORA0M0g
n5:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
1
n5:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
You wrote a review for B & L Pool Supply 2 days ago 1.0 star rating 6/22/2017 On June 9 I had them test my pool water and I was told the "Phosphates" were "high" so they sold me a $24.99 bottle of chemicals (Pool Tonic) to solve the problem. The bottle says it will treat a 20,000 gallon pool. My pool is only 12,000 gallons so I was confident it would do the job. I followed the instructions on the bottle and went in a week later for another water test. The test said my phosphates were still way high. I was told by a different sales person that it is "not uncommon" to need a couple treatments. They talked me into another bottle of the same phosphate remover for another $24.99. I again used the whole bottle and followed the instructions. Went in for a water test today and guess what. The phosphates are still way high. I told them the above scenario and said I wanted a refund for the chemicals they sold me that obviously don't work. No go on that one. After a call to the "manager" I was told I could either ignore the phosphate problem as it might be a "false reading" and just make sure I "keep the chlorine level high" to avoid algae, OR I could buy a bottle of a different phosphate remover that was even MORE expensive ($32). At his point I left the store.
n5:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n7:S9r2IjRLY_2V_DJ5gSiUkQ