This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:bLDhVkVzpFBA2m_lo6VvRg
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2009-04-16T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:h3CYGWoZiM6VLWidNQjvZQ
n3:funnyReviews
4
rev:rating
1
n3:usefulReviews
21
rev:text
I've lived in a number of apartments over the years and Crystal Creek was, by far, my favorite. It was a third floor one bedroom with a balcony that overlooked the pool. Since that balcony was on the west side I got a lot of sun some days but the sunsets and the thunderstorms made it worth it. I've often thought fondly of that apartment... That was 7 years ago. Today, I learned that a few months ago Crystal Creek put a derogatory note on my credit for $62, lowering my score by 80 points. Seriously? After 7 years? Over sixty two dollars? I still don't even know what it was for. They haven't contacted me once in all this time - even though I lived in a property owned by their management company for three years after leaving Crystal Creek. They insist that they're owed the money, too. I still don't know why. So now we have to go to court because I insist that they're high. Do you really want to live in a place where they'll go after your credit 7 years after the fact for a measly $62 without so much as a phone call?
n3:coolReviews
3
rev:reviewer
n7:qJxY4feS2V1cN9xRfdM8rg