This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n6http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:bEn3VVzGUlpQZ9qCuWboMg
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2018-04-07T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:5exz18duMXvg91ZPdNX3eA
n3:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
2
n3:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
I hate giving a 2-star review. Majority of the deduction is due to the fact that I waiting around 30-minutes for 1-thigh and 1-drumstick. That's only 2 pieces of chicken. Went around 9:00PM and although there were several orders ahead of me, there was always chicken that was available that I saw on the rack. I'm not sure if orders are done in actual order, so I had to wait for them to come to mine. But if an order is small, such as mine, I'd think you'd get to that and move on to the next one. I really wanted to try this place, since I heard the chicken was pretty good. And although I'm not going to say the chicken is junk, I wasn't wowed or ever thought to myself that I'd really want to come back because the flavor was unique or something I'd crave. To me, it was a one and done type of thing. And I hate saying that of any business. Flavor was good, but that's about it. Maybe the pieces that I had were flavored inconsistently? I'm not sure. But I did notice that a seasoning is shaked onto the chicken. Maybe mine wasn't addressed as much. And that's all that I think. Just so-so in flavor. Perhaps I *might* give them another chance, but only if I'm around the area.
n3:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n6:7nEnXfmm3ICIJtGtFAMMuQ