This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n5http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:b3sTPB5dd63oFeD8WH8hog
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2012-12-30T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:ubnV_i4xoENIJfM0OW_d4Q
n5:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
3
n5:usefulReviews
2
rev:text
I guess the renovation is nearing completion, as we had none of the negative renovation-type experiences expressed by others via Yelp. If you're into the modern/contemporary look and planning a short stay, this might be a good option for you. This was a very fancy looking hotel at a price that was lower than other such hotels in downtown Charlotte. The staff was friendly. We had a spectacular view of the city, were located within walking distance of most of Charlotte's highlights, and the beds were like sleeping on a cloud: they were ridiculously comfortable. That's not to say that the Blake was without some awkwardness, particularly, as echoed by others, when considering the showers. I think they need another go 'round on the design: you have to be in the shower to turn it on and I think they could have splurged for a SLIDING glass door instead of a stationary panel that only covers half the shower. The lighting/outlet controls were like solving the mysteries to Pan's Labyrinth, and the surprise $13 parking fee (for one night) was a bit of a let down. Otherwise this was a viable option and for a one night stay, totally serviceable.
n5:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n7:KCg3IFE8LooHWuNE4tHexA