This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n4http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:al1ma4YbM2Ta8KB4UfbwpA
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2018-05-19T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:-PzDKdcvpGVrFlmTJ942Ew
n4:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
2
n4:usefulReviews
1
rev:text
UPDATE: I took my year-old car in for state inspection. They FAILED it, claiming the rear brake rotors were scored. The car had 21,000 miles on it. Pad thickness was clearly visible through the wheel (rotors only get scored when all the pad material has worn off, leaving the metal pad-backing-plate to scrape directly on the metal rotor). I pointed this out to them, but they would not pass my car. $50 wasted. The Audi dealer passed it, of course. I'm extremely disappointed that a good-looking shop like this, that had previously done good work for me, chose to let me down in such a way. (As an aside, I used to race cars and have a bit of extra knowledge regarding brakes. I've done dozens of brake jobs. Anyone with basic car knowledge knows these rotors where fine.)
n4:coolReviews
2
rev:reviewer
n7:yVMvS4Q7JTxHALm8CTwSZQ