This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n5http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:Z3E9Rzxzjms__Ey5tq9_Cw
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2018-06-07T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:aaTOjQzSDYbRchbHB6nXAw
n3:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
4
n3:usefulReviews
1
rev:text
Beware the termite report. These guys were pretty good. They inspected a house we were looking to buy and the report was very thorough regarding possible issues in the home. I do recommend them. There are a few draw backs. It is difficult to reach out to them. Of the six times I have called their office, only once was the phone ever answered. They are good at following up, but it is often next day and at a time that is inconvenient for me. Also, beware the termite report. I just got off the phone with them explaining it to me. They don't actually do any tests for any active termite infestations. The inspection is looking around, shining a flash light at stuff, and saying "look, termites were here" or "this could cause a termite issue". It is exactly what they were already doing (shining light around) but they charge you an extra $65 to write down termite specific things on a separate piece of paper. This means we are stuck in a situation where we know there were termites, and we know there was a treatment, but we have no clue if there is a current infestation that needs to be addressed. The termite 'inspection' simply feels like a way to get extra money, without adding an additional value to what was already being done.
n3:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n5:RH7HvFMbyxLhqxvKgevO5Q