This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n4http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
n5http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:XcSoTckY19hC9-txWkPuOQ
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2016-10-20T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n5:qL-tMAkLxQc8NnEYVZJ6Eg
n4:funnyReviews
1
rev:rating
5
n4:usefulReviews
6
rev:text
Wow, frankly I'm surprised at these negative reviews. Judging from the other reviews, they may be guilty of being more selective when it comes to choosing homes for their animals but let there be no doubt that this rescue loves animals and are completely committed to them. I'm also confused as to why so many of the positive reviews listed under "not recommended", even some from people that have many other reviews. Please read those too or better yet just go to the shelter. Obviously I wasn't present during any of these people's interactions so I can't speak anymore about them. I can only speak to what I know and that nobody cares more (maybe as much, but not more) about the well-being and that these pets end up in a loving home more than the volunteer and director of this shelter. But to the point, years ago my wife worked with them to adopt a dog and after our eldest dog passed recently there was only one rescue we considered going to for another dog - this one. Interactions with the staff and director have have always been pleasant and man do I love our "new" dog Coco (Puffs). I'm not sure what else to say except this animal rescue loves animals and is fully committed to their well-being.
n4:coolReviews
1
rev:reviewer
n7:Pi5YM6FTWaLr7J6DEH3tDQ