This is more of a rebuttal and a little update to Bautista's K (the owner?) review since I was mentioned in it.
----"As for Shirley B. - was very surprised to find this review redundant. As if it was to sabotage a business and give a review only on the 3rd day of "soft opening" -"----
Am I understanding this right? I am being accused of sabotage? I sure hope not.
I cant take this unwarranted accusation lightly and feel the need to address it.
I normally do write ups after a first visit to new places but my review was based after a second visit (2/10) to this place a week and a half later, not on the 3rd day of soft opening (Jan 30) that Bautista K comprehended. . Go over and reread my review again, 4th paragraph where I mention my 2nd visit.
As for redundancy, I cant help that since both visits when I ate there, temperature wise, the food was not hot enough. Which by the way is fact since it was reflected in SNHD inspection a day later coincidentally after my review was written. Update: I'm happy Bautista's took proactive steps and corrected it and now rockin the A grade.
For the most part my review was positive as I mention food tasted good, prices reasonable and friendly staff. Some people think I'm way too nice and too generous with the ratings I dish out. Sorry you take the overall review as sabotaging your business but I still stand by my original review.
I sure hope the accusation is just a misunderstanding. All who know me know I am a big advocate and supporter for businesses in our community and only want to see everyone succeed. Even your business here in Vegas Bautista K! Happy to hear you are doing great with all the new dishes I see you are now offering and possibly look forward to trying them one of these days.