This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n5http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n4http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:TYRC2ZvnMmXryOI7cR4pPg
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2016-03-09T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:i9D9xPBV0gR1Ja9kbY4NCw
n5:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
2
n5:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
We tried this place on the advice of the food critic in our local newspaper. She liked it. We felt differently. The facility is clean and cute, but the food was a problem. My entree, a croissant breakfast sandwich, was luke warm and greasy. The bacon was undercooked and there was too much salad served with it. The other entree that was ordered was the pork carnitas omelette, highly recommended. Not a good choice. The entree was barely warm and the pork tasted old. Our coffee selections were no better. The cup of decaf was not hot and tasted like instant coffee right out of one of those jars. My latte was not hot either and was only OK. Any of the local coffee shops near by do a much better job. Guess my point is that the phrase "luke warm and not so good" was the theme of the breakfast we selected. We did not hang around to try any of the pastries, but I am sure any of them would have been better choices that the items we ordered. We like to support new local restaurants, and I am sad to write a poor review about this one. We will not be going back.
n5:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n4:x648zpsHvoTCqtS1gAaOBQ