This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n5http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:SurvDR5yBJAD4kGErRS32w
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2017-04-05T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:H_AEozeQfFrn6VJGDJEcKA
n3:funnyReviews
1
rev:rating
1
n3:usefulReviews
1
rev:text
I wouldn't recommend this hospital. I took my granddaughter in for a skin problem and they insisted it was impetigo when it was poison oak. A few months later my husband went to the emergency room with a huge skin lump and another misdiagnosis. They said it is not something they can lance and sent him home saying to take a painkiller. He got home and cut into it and it was a staff infection. I called there and the manager said she would deal with the PAs and would have the business office call me to deal with the bill. I don't think I should pay for a second diagnosis and only asked for the $150 copay and they did nothing but look at it. She called 2 weeks later and said they were still working on it and that was months and months ago. I don't remember the charge to our insurance for my husband but my granddaughters visit was around 1600. They do not do well with skin issues. There is no wait time which is nice but the lack of expertise is a problem if there is a life threatening issue.
n3:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n5:lJ_vyOAE7cYptfQGf9EHzQ