This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:Ser0oBhbDnXJyiOiFB9tZQ
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2016-03-25T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:AC5xPzdf_injgKVBaW6sgg
n3:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
1
n3:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
I'm left feeling guilty for referring my uninsured friend to this office. I called and inquired about how much a regular cleaning would be for a patient without insurance, as was the case for my friend. They informed me that they had a "New Patient Special" for $99, so I made the appointment. Immediately following the appointment the referral informed me that all they did was take x-rays and tell him that he only qualified for a $1000 "deep cleaning," not a "basic cleaning." They then would not provide the basic cleaning that we scheduled but still charged him $99! I called to express my dissatisfaction but was offered little remorse, only a "Sorry, tough luck" kind of response. The receptionist tried to play it off as though receiving x-rays for only $99 was still a good deal, but a cleaning is specifically what I asked for when making the appointment and was specifically what I was told the "Special" would include. Are we really ripping off people without insurance? And then once you get them in there try to rope them into a much more expensive service... Can you say bait and switch?
n3:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n7:QIW34YOZsNEEYXKrKc_xww