This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n6http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:SFNtmQekUAIFtgTEprNGVg
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2010-09-07T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:-GWI_4FktOD7fwHW1DgZCA
n3:funnyReviews
1
rev:rating
2
n3:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
All right. If you're a straight lady going to Hooters then you're going for the wings. Am I right? Unless you're trying to prove something. And I think I've been good about saying this - heck, I haven't had to say it yet because the QC has been a pleasant surprise for the most part - but every Hooters in Chicagoland has better wings than this Hooters. Hell, the Hooters in Puerto Vallarta had better wings. These were not as flavorful, the batter was not as... I don't know, flakey I suppose. They were extremely mediocre. Now I prefer to go to a small local joint over a chain most of the time, I prefer to try something new. So dang it, if I want Hooters wings, they need to taste like Hooters wings! Standardization, people! Bah. Well, the server was sweet at least. Sometimes when a couple walks into a Hooters, they get snubbed a bit because the waitresses are all leaning over the horny businessman tables trying to get tips. But Shaun (I think that was how it was spelled) was nice.
n3:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n6:htzxDWzRt4Xd7UGy4t0yAw