This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n7http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n4http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:QTvdV8WtPNG5kJHojWG_sg
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2018-06-20T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:6App6DCpDQ9q7Htgr8zJrQ
n7:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
5
n7:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
I was out and about and wanted to satisfy my craving for Jerk Chicken. I looked up the map in my trusty yelp app and spotted Betta Jerk closest to me. Drove there, parked and walked in, not a fancy place, actually difficult to see due to the color of the sign, there were tables available to dine in, walked up to the counter, reviewed my options and spotted the Jerk Chicken lunch special. The special came in a burger sized container, it had a small chicken drum and quarter, served on a bed of rice with beans as well as a small dab of coleslaw. The chicken looked good (dark spices coated the skin) was well cooked and had a dryer texture but was extremely tender and fell of the bone. Flavor was very good and had a hint of spice. The rice was also very good, well cooked and the spice level in mine was amped to a 9/10! where as the person I was with had a much lower level of spice 5/10. I guess I depends where they scooped it from. I'm not a big fan of slaw so I won't comment either way, and in any case, there was not enough to make a reasonable assumption. Overall Betta Jerk hit the spot for me and their lunch special is definitely worth a look and taste. I will be back and looking forward to trying their other specials and meals.
n7:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n4:iT0lKL00EWx0MX9FvUwyZA