This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
n5http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:MA15d0vZN8T1InNEQZqQjw
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2007-04-13T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n5:vfn-BKoMtOG6bf-QoU5b6Q
n3:funnyReviews
1
rev:rating
1
n3:usefulReviews
8
rev:text
After talking about the New Times in the forums, I thought I should probably bring my opinion here! I used to read the New Times regularly and really enjoyed their articles. I ate up their stories on Arpaio and other political subjects. But then a group I'm part of was the subject of a really deceptive column, and I learned an acquaintance of mine had a feature article written about her in which they completely fabricated some quotes, and then there's the whole 'April Fool's' fiasco with the article on the chef who prepared endangered species... Anyway, bottom line is that the New Times is here to provide entertainment at their subjects' expense, and very rarely provide news. I still read it sometimes for a laugh or to check out event listings, but that's about it. I'm sure there's stellar information in here every so often, but I'd rather not wade through the bullshit to find it.
n3:coolReviews
2
rev:reviewer
n7:l5Fba-9TGiK9q0KqlaNUIQ