This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n6http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n5http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:LlO95_S31k1qeaflzdVADg
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2010-12-09T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n5:g-I48SaHtdIGR5ZEoVeNFw
n6:funnyReviews
2
rev:rating
2
n6:usefulReviews
6
rev:text
No. Just no. This wasn't the worst sushi experience I've ever had, but it was (very) far from the best. Nothing about Sushi Ken made me want to return. When I stepped in on Friday it was busy, so it definitely fueled my anticipation. But, after my meal I was wondering why all these people didn't just head down the street to (this other sushi place I know). The service meant well -- a little slow, but friendly enough. The atmosphere was kind of cool -- kind of that well-worn Asian restaurant vibe I remember from San Francisco. Only this place doesn't really serve up "the goods." The sushi was lacking. Some of it was alright. But some was just..."no." Namely the Spicy Tuna; it was this bland, texture-less pink paste that I assume was made out of tuna, but you couldn't really prove it. Anyway, I was bummed because I really wanted to like Sushi Ken; I heard such great things about it, and it's really close to my neighborhood. But walking away, all I could think was, "Meh. I've experienced better."
n6:coolReviews
1
rev:reviewer
n7:lU_aNRWw8edBmIi5_NARmg