This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n5http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n4http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:IKl0l1wZEdzWSkWnTYcrXw
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2016-04-19T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:c_5--h3KEQqo4xw_bpc5HQ
n5:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
3
n5:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
I have utilized this location for a complex bridesmaid dress alteration before and had a good experience. Recently I went back for a much more simple alteration of a casual dress that needed taking in on the waist area only. No lining etc. Very very simple. The lady who was giving me a price quote seemed to come across as price gauging every little thing. Her quote was higher than anticipated. The dress cost new at the store for around $48. The quote for a simple take in at the waist only , no lining started at +$30. The material wasn't difficult or elegant either, just basic polyester. I went ahead and had them do the alterations after the clerk told me everything extra they had to do. When I went in to pick it up I turned the dress inside out to see how they did the stitching. They just did a basic straight stitch through. Not all the extra complicated stuff she was trying to tell me to justify the price. This was rather upsetting with how much they charged me. I finished the other alterations at home with my basic sewing machine and it turned out fine without having to get ripped off again. I was disappointed because my experience prior to this was a good one but now I feel hesitant to go back.
n5:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n4:Y6dV4TpQN9cepJ2X-VaO3A