This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n6http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n5http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:FbltCrfLgusdkZykj5t3Mg
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2013-01-27T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n5:3gcERaGF0OquFMr-SeVJ7w
n6:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
3
n6:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
Ok...so maybe it was a bad night. I was introduced to Garrett during a trip to Chicago months ago. It was by far the best popcorn I ever tasted and I even brought some home. I was full of excitement when I saw that one opened in Planet Hollywood. However, I only knew it was there because I passed by the sign. I wasn't invited by that yummy sweet popcorn smell that smothers the streets of downtown Chicago. Anyway, I decided to drop in for a bag of Chicago mix after the show. Needless to say I was not impressed. Popcorn was not fresh and it did not melt in my mouth. I did not crave it like I usually do, as I was able to put the bag down and stop eating it. I can only assume that maybe it was old because it was 1 AM. Then again, I ate Garrett from Chicago two days after buying it and it was still good. So what's the problem here? They really need to step it up a notch here in Vegas because I had a better popcorn at a booth in Meadows Mall. Guess I'll have to make another trip to the Chi after all smh.
n6:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n7:dMsFSuVoC0-ZT6ReJ2HnWQ