This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n6http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n5http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:EBGDfat0CiK1txBkzd-0Og
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2016-02-02T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n5:W98fZXdlQIUBRjWah7U-ng
n6:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
1
n6:usefulReviews
25
rev:text
BEWARE Embrace! IMO, very shady company -- watch out for totally bogus claim denials. Embrace is hands down the worst insurance company I have ever dealt with -- and Im a retired health care attorney with years of experience navigating claims. Here's just one example: Last August (2015) we took our dog to the vet b/c she was vomiting -- maybe ate something toxic? When we submitted our claim to Embrace, they indicated we no longer had a policy with them. I figured it had lapsed -- assumed that was our mistake. But when I learned monthly premiums were still being deducted from our bank, I called to clarify. Was told -- Oh yeah, that's right, you DO have a policy -- yeah, our prior communication was confusing.... So did Embrace then immediately pay for the august vet's visit? Nope. Embrace refused to pay -- claimed her vomiting was due to a "pre-existing condition." And what was their basis for saying her august 2015 vomiting was caused by a "pre-existing condition?" Well, the medical records show that she had actually vomited once before -- A YEAR BEFORE -- in August of 2014. Yep. Embrace asserts that if a dog is treated for vomiting in August 2015, they can refuse to pay -- calling it a "preexisting condition" --solely because that dog had vomited -- ONCE -- 12 MONTHS EARLIER. Of course I asked what disease or "pre-exisinting condition" could possibly make an animal vomit once-every-12-months --- of course the Embrace claims rep had no answer. Just another standard attempt to get away with non-payment of valid claims.... This is not the only example of what I consider to be bad-faith denials -- just one of their more blatant. State regulators really should be taking a look at this company.
n6:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n7:ZEsRqfzIl31pTFAU-lBAOg