This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n4http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n5http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:DrWPTzWTTUHaGl3pc_lR5A
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2012-06-15T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:K7lWdNUhCbcnEvI0NhGewg
n4:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
3
n4:usefulReviews
1
rev:text
I write this thinking this should be a 3.5..... I have been to the Wynn brunch at least 4 times and it's always a go-to. When my group learned there was a new one with a unique theme we decided to try it! It definitely didn't disappoint...but I think the Wynn still wins this battle. What I liked: *Clever packaging in unique containers *Clever food ideas and unique food combinations (whereas Wynn features more of the classics) *Fav dishes - moroccan chk w. couscous, angry mac and cheese, chicken wings, french toast What disappointed: *A handful of dishes were really blah. I've rarely had something at the Wynn that was blah. Eggs benedict was meh. Green curry noodles - I've never tasted curry so bland. Corn with cojita cheese just ok. So while some of the clever dishes at Wicked Spoon were really interesting and clever and cute in packaging, when you factor in the blah-dishes it is only 3/3.5 No don't get me wrong I definitely got my money's worth in the dishes that WERE good, but it needs to up its consistency across its offerings. TIP - go before 11a. The line gets crazy afterwards!!
n4:coolReviews
1
rev:reviewer
n5:LZt80LbsfQ9kOz96H7c1bA