This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n4http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n5http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:CK8jGYAA2AEY9dER4Xj1gQ
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2017-01-11T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:7kFia1SeOyYltEfk5Jthxg
n4:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
2
n4:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
Purchased the same membrane that I always do the $35 one. A couple years ago this membrane worked flawlessly and kept my TDS 10-15ppm. The new ones are no good. I couldn't get them under 40ppm. BLA BLABLA about whats going in BLA BLA BLA. Nothing has change with my water source. But what has changed is that they now offer a 99% rejection membrane. Well I was getting 98% with the old $35 one. For me 1% isn't a big deal and thats why I got a new $35 membrane. The new membrane only gave me a 92-94% rejection. Called them up. No real help with the issue. What I really think happened was they found a way to charge more. The "NEW" $35 membrane I believe is a sub-par model. And the "NEW" $60 membrane is the old $35 one with a "NEW" higher price. I now use DOW membranes with a cheaper cost and better results.
n4:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n5:noRCd744AD5cAT0nuq5Aaw