This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n6http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n5http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:ANPWxtex95l1tRFZNptlGQ
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2014-01-25T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n5:eozQYPEJxM711L2z5r852A
n6:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
4
n6:usefulReviews
1
rev:text
My wife and I went for a couples massage at Bayview RMT about a month ago. Everything was simple and straightforward as we would expect. My RMT was great - nothing was overworked or underworked. My wife's story was a bit different, but then it's likely because she mentioned her back was sore and therefore received 60 minutes on her back alone. The room was a good size and inviting, It really was an overall relaxing experience. The only two negative points are small but worth mentioning. First is the it's located in an area of old houses converted to commercial properties right on Sheppard, which is a fairly busy street. It's not the easiest to get into or out of with traffic, but this isn't a huge issue. It's also a slightly steep/narrow climb to the upper floor. The second issue is my insurance wouldn't cover the full cost because they deemed it to be higher than normal. We didn't get any special treatments, and I wouldn't have expected to have any issues with a 60 minute treatment. All things said, I would consider going back there once in a while, but not for regular treatments mainly due to the cost.
n6:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n7:BzHsUCqb2YrifQ7ao91M_Q