This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n3http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n5http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:AINe1m7473C3AUQsxG3obw
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2013-08-02T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:YAODkC2s68TbF_kB9rFmMQ
n3:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
1
n3:usefulReviews
6
rev:text
This is in reference to the lease return process at BMW Camelback which has been very aggravating. I leased the vehicle through our Fleet account company has with BMW Chapman. I have held the car for 3 years. I did a pre-lease inspection 1 week before car was turned in. During inspection, I was told 2 front tires and 1 rim with curb rash would need to be replaced. Total cost would be $1000 for which I had no problems paying. However, when I went to turn in vehicle, I was told all 4 tires were below wear and tear limits and 3 of the rims had curb rash and needed replacing. Total cost $2400. I agreed to turn the car into service and get the rims repaired. I got call from service 1 day before lease maturity date to inform me battery was low and needed replacement. Cost $547. After angry conversation with service agent and service manager, it was agreed that this will be covered under warranty. I feel there was a lack of honesty regarding repairs on the vehicle during pre-lease inspection. I trusted BMW to provide an experience to not only match but exceed the lease return process of it's competitors. Instead, it's alienated me to the point at which I would not even consider leasing another BMW.
n3:coolReviews
1
rev:reviewer
n5:RS5qRwpy66w1ADVylNhX1A