This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n5http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:9cqSqZRaDC6agJUgPE-RUg
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2011-09-22T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:xGHm4DZdVjo-fLO0EkRXvQ
n5:funnyReviews
3
rev:rating
3
n5:usefulReviews
3
rev:text
As I have more times than I care to admit, I stopped by the Real Jerk tonight to pick up dinner. As always, I got the chicken and chickpea roti, and, as always, with enough hot sauce, it was enjoyable. So why only a three then? My actual rating would be a solid 3.5. Here's my rationale: The food is okay, but nothing I'd rave about. Since it's right around the corner from my place, I've tried a variety of things on the menu. Most aren't complete disappointments, but the only thing I'd feel confident recommending to a friend is the roti because its quality seems to be the most consistent and for the price, it's reasonable. I think the biggest issue I have with The Real Jerk is the service; not surprisingly the number of my take-out visits greatly outweigh the times I've eaten there. I've had a few good servers there; don't get me wrong. Unfortunately, I've had more that seem to be doing me a great favour to take my order or money. And frankly that makes them well... a real, you know... jerk.
n5:coolReviews
2
rev:reviewer
n7:VVm-TFCpi9M1-k8ED0l1eA