This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n7http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n6http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n4http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:8YcHC-bYWZK5kS4hsfKVZw
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2012-08-24T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n6:Bg8xZT4-NsYLYd-WPIhgXw
n7:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
2
n7:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
Eh. Same complaints as most. While sometimes nothing hits the spot like a simple dog with a plain ol white bread bun, these dogs definitely need something more substantial to hold up to the ample toppings- I was annoyed with the explode-a-bun by the end of lunch. I really enjoyed the banh mi dog concept and the toppings were dee-lish, fresh, and very tasty but I didn't love the dog. I like a more beefy, strongly flavored hot dog and this seemed more like a vehicle for toppings. Definitely wouldn't satisfy my craving if I was really in the mood for hot dogs. DH had the chili dog and enjoyed it. We had the poutine as well, and while the individual parts were yum I thought they could have served it a little hotter so the curds would start to melt- they were kinda cold and hard, and way too big to spread the love and enjoy with the whole pile of fries. We probably wouldn't go again, my overall impression was that it was gimmicky and wasn't really a "hot dog" stand so much as a "put fancy stuff on something simple isn't this neat" stand.
n7:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n4:vSeltqO5Yn08_wKDlnQqXw