This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n4http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n6http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:7-RIIG4omV5XR7fxVJYLYA
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2016-05-11T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:KXITXbKuE60WSUDs7NZVLQ
n4:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
3
n4:usefulReviews
1
rev:text
Not great. Not terrible. If you are on a budget save your money!! This is not a family restaurant. Casual dress. Now that we have the warnings out of the way, let's get to the review! I decided on the 1/2 chicken because I did not see any other reviews on here about it. The overall ambience of this restaurant was pleasurable to say the least. It has a modern vibe, but rustic look. Much like the chicken I had. The first item delivered to my table after my ice water was two bread rolls. These rolls had a sweet aroma, and right away my mouth began to water. I was getting sweet rolls! Very good, but not the best. The butter was cold, so it was a bit difficult to spread. Onto the main meal. A beautiful looking chicken was bestowed upon a bed of potatoes surrounded by a molasses looking goo around the plate. The smell was pleasant. When I cut into the chicken I could tell that the it had been cooked well. But when I started eating I was getting any flavor. I was quite disappointed by this. But the chicken was a good quality bird, so that makes up for the lack of flavor within the skin. The potatoes were ok, but they could have done more with this dish. In review: This is just a sub par celebrity chef restaurant. Go spend your winnings somewhere else!
n4:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n6:tKU08REPP5rgElGdC3tgYg