This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n5http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
n4http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:5Y_UZZjmMqTQZdubBt9fjA
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2017-10-07T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n4:1tnnwS_2paNSGwtH8CFxgA
n5:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
4
n5:usefulReviews
0
rev:text
I like the community, management, and my apartment. In the year and a half that I've lived here, it's all been positive. My only dissatisfaction is that they have non-smoking buildings which they charge an extra $35 a month for. In my strong opinion, I feel smokers should be the ones charged to live in a smoking building, as it costs management more money to turn an apartment that a previous smoker has lived in. My neighbors constantly smoke, and I often can't open my windows because of it. It seems to me that management has it backwards by charging non-smokers for the choice of not being subjected to that disgusting habit. However, if they're going to provide non-smoking buildings as an option, it should be at the same rent as the other apartments so as not to penalize non-smokers. Would love to see them re-visit this.
n5:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n7:hVjz46ssj5WwAccqUfetEQ