This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n4http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n5http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:5XDZok2vfUJK49s13NpG9w
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2017-03-10T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:DmI_LeX9AZnIiMu1vm7o0Q
n4:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
1
n4:usefulReviews
2
rev:text
Foster's cleans our carpets once a year and they are paid by my apartment complex. It's a general cleaning, which in my case is done in September. The general cleaning wasn't cleaning up three spots on the carpet. I called them on January to come out and clean the spots. They charged me $55. Which was fine. Less than two months later, one of the spots is visible again. I called today to see if they could treat that spot again and was told, " it was done so long ago" they would have to charge me $55 to come out and treat that one spot again. Less than two months is too long ago?? I don't agree with that at all. I asked if I had them come out and clean a chair I have, which also is $55, if they could treat that spot at the same time included in the base charge of $55. I was told no. They would have to charge for the chair and the spot. Both $55. SO, instead of getting more of my business by cleaning my chair and taking care of a spot they didn't clean completely, they aren't getting any of my business and I get to write a poor review about them. I'm in the customer service business and this was poor customer service. I could be writing a much different review if their customer service was up to par. Don't use Foster's. Very disappointing.
n4:coolReviews
1
rev:reviewer
n5:bbJaTyi-J0Nst2fhYnGDuw