This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n6http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n5http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:2QA3jMBbqj1aWpxf_meDqQ
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2014-07-22T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:Zh6ewryBG1z__aug1jGWxQ
n6:funnyReviews
0
rev:rating
3
n6:usefulReviews
2
rev:text
Definitely competitively priced. Communication is not their strong point. I scheduled a move and called back a bunch of times, leaving unreturned messages to ensure it was scheduled and that they had received my signed contract. They were about 1.5hr late for the move ("staffing issues") and I was somewhat turned off by the comment "you don't have to tip us but if you do make sure you give it to us each, I don't trust __[another of the movers]__." Mind you that person had clipped $10 bills to his shirt to show that he accepted gratuity That being said, the move was very quick and relatively painless once they got to work. One of the movers, Rodney, definitely knew what he was doing and instructed the others on how to carry items properly. Luckily, he did the packing of the breakable items as well and was very careful to wrap items numerous times. They bring their own moving blankets and I appreciated how they wrapped the couches and mattresses with saran wrap to prevent damage, it seemed to help. So, other than the sketchiness as above, the move ended up going fine with minimal damage to the walls and items (definitely a plus). Would I go with them again? Yes, if I could ensure that they had a crew with at least a few people who had moved before
n6:coolReviews
0
rev:reviewer
n5:NKclK5Gl1yete7E6jiFibg