This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n5http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/
n7http://data.yelp.com/Business/id/
revhttp://purl.org/stuff/rev#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n6http://data.yelp.com/User/id/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:-t8lQuPD38Or2C8UK1vhuA
rdf:type
rev:Review
schema:dateCreated
2015-01-25T00:00:00
schema:itemReviewed
n7:4oUBoG5Ui48wUSvy2rS4VQ
n5:funnyReviews
1
rev:rating
1
n5:usefulReviews
6
rev:text
Decided to try this place from the yelp reviews and groupon deal. Most of all, I've had an amazing lash person but with my schedule she could not accommodate my late schedule air see me on the weekends unfortunately. She is one of the best! Anyway, this place is Friendly and clean facility. But I am Not happy with the quality of my lashes here. Had synthetics the first time and they were too heavy. Bad decision - they looked nice but unnatural. It was perfect for the holiday parties. Went back for fills with synthetic mink instead, and they felt better. but I've had synthetic mink before - the ones they put on me still feel heavier than what I'm used to and in just a week they started to shed. They tangle and have irritated my eyes. I worry if they are twisted everyday and have had to remove some from looking out of place or falling into my eyes. I've had lash extensions done with synthetics that felt more natural and lasted longer with no problem before. I could go back and ask for a resolve because it's only been a week, but I don't feel they're the best compared to what I've had. Overall, I would not recommend this place for extensions.
n5:coolReviews
1
rev:reviewer
n6:PiDPwcqd01Wt07dEQIG1kg