About: http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/c384Z8oknBegDDOlpYrGqQ     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : rev:Review, within Data Space : foodie-cloud.org, foodie-cloud.org associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
type
dateCreated
itemReviewed
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#funnyReviews
rev:rating
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#usefulReviews
rev:text
  • I originally hired Action termite because I wanted a COMPLETE inspection of my property. When Scott first arrived, he concurred that it was necessary to inspect UNDER my park model to determine if we had a problem. He agreed with my assessment that an brief external exam was not sufficient. I pointed out some minor damage that had occurred before another company had treated our home 2 years prior. Although there was no signs of current activity in that area, Scott then only made a cursory exam of our unit, removing a couple of panels and shining a flashlight briefly into my crawl space. And no time did he go into the crawlspace despite having stated earlier that it was necessary to determine IF there was a problem. He then stated their was no signs of termites in my home. He then proposed a $600 treatment followed by yearly $150 exams. He admitted he had not adequately examined the crawl space area but said that was not necessary as the technicians would look when they treated. WHY WOULD I PAY FOR A $600 TREATMENT WHEN HE HAD FOUND NO ACTIVE TERMITES and my home had been treated 6 months ago?????? Scott was aware another company had recently treated my home. While many companies offer FREE inspections, Action termite charged me $68 to come out and give me an estimate for treatment, despite having found no evidence of active termites. BUYER BEWARE! It appears their $68 inspection fee is really just charging you so they can market their treatment service, needed or not!
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#coolReviews
rev:reviewer
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Sep 26 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Sep 26 2023, on Linux (x86_64-generic_glibc25-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 116 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software