So I was a bit shocked to see Maharaja was replaced, and I went in to their lunch buffet to compare (with a skeptical pallet). I don't understand why some people said it was worse than before, I thought it was fantastic! Pretty much the exact same menu and selections as before, except it seems to be even a little bit better, but I just can't put my finger on why.
I'm a big eater; I always get my money's worth. I tried almost everything at the buffet, it was all as good as if not better than Maharaja used to be. I'd definitely say it's a step up not a step down. Don't fear change, it's not a bad thing in this case!